All the newspaper is ok to say that The Cure renew with passion and well-done
work.
R.S : "The difference is for a great part in the media. For years, we were
confined in the specialized newspapers and suddenly, some reporters
from popular newspapers are interrested in us again. It's a snowball effect.
I try not to think too much about that because I don't think that "The Cure"
is a special album. In fact, saying we're back is to deny the existence of
our last albums. I don't have the feeling we have vanished or have missed
my objectives during the 90's. By example, "Bloodflowers" was the only Cure
album to have been nominated for the Grammy awards. It's not like we haven't
done anything good since the 80's. It's a cycle. Today we're back in the front
page. I'm not complaining about that, it brings the attention back on the
band.
You don't wanna praise that album to the skies ?
I refuse to think that it's the only good thing we made for the past 10
years. We can't compare our albums between itselves. "Bloodflowers" was
almost a solo album in wich I was trying to deal with about forty. This
time, for "The Cure" we came back to a band work. We played together in
a small room, we recorded in the same place, day after day, without focusing
on the result. I think that sometimes the person who listens can
imagine being with us in the studio. The great difference comes from the
band. There's an intensity we didn't have for a long time. It doesn't
make (the cure) a better album but a different album. More coherent maybe.
It opens on this sentence : "I can't find myself".
This sentence was inspired to me by The view from nowhere, a book from Thomas
Nagel. The search for oneself, the search of our own essence,
it's an old philosophical question. What made me the man I'm today and how
does this man look like for other's eyes ? Before we began this
album, we had a long discussion with the band. We had to know if we wanted
a new album and how we wanted it looks like. We spoke about a lot
of things but, quickly, the discussion ended up on the change notion. Each
said to the others how he was changed in 30 years. I met Simon when
I was 15 and said to him how he was changed. He said to me that I wasn't
looking like the little Robert he met in the past. We're often looking
back on our adolescence but when we're adults, we don't take the time
to point out the situation. It was very interresting. What made me
change ? I don't know. That's the reason why the album opens on "I can't
find myself". I wrote this sentence when I was around 45. It's an import
theme on the album.
In LOST, you're talking about a boy "so happy and so young". Who's this
boy ?
It's me... I wrote those words in my office. On the wall, there's a picture
of Myself when I was 12. I was looking at the pic for a long time, trying
to remember my state of mind in that moment. I physically recognize me but
can't figure out the child I was. It looks like I'm very happy on the pic
but can't especially remember that moment. The unpleasant feeling of the time
going by is a recurrent them for The Cure. I like to say I'm changing. It
would be really more unpleasant to confess I'm getting older.
But does happiness goes together only with youth ? Adult seems to be a sentenced
person for you ?
It's a little bit right. Even if as a child or teenager we can be very unhappy
too. It's notably what "TEOTW" is talking about. A little event
arises and makes your world fall apart. By the same time, youth goes together
with innocence. It's close to a invulnerability feeling, freedom where
nothing can affraid you. It's a feeling impossible to find back when we
grow older because we must became responsible. I don't have children. I
can keep a good part of irresponsability in my life and that makes me sometimes
happy. In this album, "Anniversary" talks about how the times
goes by. When you're a child, each birthday is a celebration. It's different
when you grow older. Each years brings you closer of death. Adult is not necessary
someone sad but at least less happy because he lost this feeling of complete
self abnegation.
Is it the reason why the cover art is a child drawing ?
Yes. I wanted to remember with wich intensity I was burying in my drawings.
Whatever the result, often rough, of a child's drawing, his creation is intense.
It's this vision of happiness I wanted to give through this drawing. This
simple happiness to completely fall in creation. It's still this feeling that
makes me happy today as an artist.
Drawing or music, objective is the same ?
Yes. it's to blossom. But I think it's true, even for drawing too, that
music's power fades when people are getting older. Today, music is everywhere
in the shops, video games, television. It has the tendency to became a backdrop.
I completely refuse that. When I'm listening to music at home, it stays an
intense and privilegied moment during wich I'm not doing anything else. That's
the reason why I'm still doing this job today, because it represents still
a lot of things for me.
Have you finally understood why people made you an Icon ?
Not really. I think they felt concerned by the words of some songs. As I'm
the singer and that my look was easy to copy, they choose me. I sometimes
wonder what would they have done if I had been blonde with a moustache.
Would they have copy this look too ? It makes me smile. I try to not think
too much to that phenomenon because according to me it doesn't turn around
my own person but well around what The Cure reached to represent with the
passing years.
(Thanks to Alexandre for translating and typing
it all up)