[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
A novel technique to fight spam is to require senders to do something costly for each message they send. This has the obvious drawback that you cannot rely on everyone in the world using this technique, since it is not part of the Internet standards, but it may be useful in smaller communities.
While the tools in the previous section work well in practice, they work only because the tools are constantly maintained and updated as new form of spam appears. This means that a small percentage of spam will always get through. It also means that somewhere, someone needs to read lots of spam to update these tools. Hashcash avoids that, but instead requires that everyone you communicate with supports the scheme. You can view the two approaches as pragmatic vs dogmatic. The approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages, but as often in the real world, a combination of them is stronger than either one of them separately.
The "something costly" is to burn CPU time, more specifically to
compute a hash collision up to a certain number of bits. The
resulting hashcash cookie is inserted in a `X-Hashcash:'
header. For more details, and for the external application
hashcash
you need to install to use this feature, see
http://www.cypherspace.org/~adam/hashcash/. Even more
information can be found at http://www.camram.org/.
If you wish to call hashcash for each message you send, say something like:
(require 'hashcash) (add-hook 'message-send-hook 'mail-add-payment) |
The `hashcash.el' library can be found in the Gnus development contrib directory or at http://users.actrix.gen.nz/mycroft/hashcash.el.
You will need to set up some additional variables as well:
hashcash-default-payment
hashcash-payment-alist
hashcash
hashcash
binary is installed.
Currently there is no built in functionality in Gnus to verify hashcash cookies, it is expected that this is performed by your hand customized mail filtering scripts. Improvements in this area would be a useful contribution, however.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |